Antibiotic Treatment For Std

debt fell "tab?


By Manolo Giménez

This Sunday July 20, through a note Horacio Verbitsky in Page 12 -then summarized in a dispatch from the official agency Telam - , was reported that the Government finally acknowledged the formidable scam the major grain exporters tried to carry out against the Argentine people. And to be willing to investigate the recommendation of the Bureau of Farm Trade Control (ONCCA).

Of course, at any time slips any reference to the responsibility of the executive and parliamentary ruling on the issue. Or the functionality indisputable that such a move paid the repealed Resolution 125.

All oligarchs are equal

Not so with a certain Horacio Rene Ducret, who is engaged in several lines incriminating note Télam page 12 and as the Vice President Luis Ducret & Cia SA, which registered 3 000 tonnes of corn and sunflower.

figure which contrasts, for example, with those submitted by Cargill contained declaring, without them or if any acquired 4 million and 22,500 tons of soybean, sunflower, 25 000 tonnes of maize, 120 thousand of sunflower oil and 436 000 soybean oil.

Or by General Deheza Oil, the company of Senator Robert Urquía, which states under the same conditions, 54,500 tons of sunflower oil, sunflower oil 11,000, 381,000 of soybean oil and soybean meal 1,325,000

The prominence that is given to answer the complaint Ducret his capacity as chairman of the Rural Society of Baradero (yes, Baradero) and having participated in the rural protest.

A watchdog

Although no adjectives too, Horacio Verbitsky refers to the legal regime that allowed corporations to freeze the price and the rate per day of registration and the decision of the Ministry of Agriculture, which granted them 365 days for the deal with frozen values.

Also in the first days of November 2007 there were 26.5 million tonnes, freezing and the effective rate of 27.5 percent. Just days before the increase of the tax rate to 35 percent.

face of all this evidence of collusion between corporations and the government attempted a covert defense Verbitsky, at times childish. Like when he says that corporations executed the maneuver and not according to the authorities of the area or misfeasance criminal of some official, but because "since 1 November 2007 press reports let them know that the deductions would be increased from 27 to 35 percent "(SIC).

O from pure sophistry, saying that in the first month of the conflict, the government tried to reform the law that exempts grains-grains and their products to pay the price level of the day export, but the reform "was delayed by the dynamics of events."

I would say that if something is justified to Congress to send this reform was precisely "the dynamics of events." On the other hand, that during the last four years there were more of an opportunity to change from the law and even unconstitutional Code.

regulation also refers to the 26,351 law-or law Raymond Martinez backup withholding applies to those operators who can not show driveways sales with purchases of grains and byproducts, and the allocation of control of the affidavits the onca.

In this regard, stresses that Ricardo Echegaray Verbitsky to take over as president of ONCCA reduced the term to realize the export of 365 to 45 days and began an investigation. Questions

absent

If known since early November, the media, the impending increase in the rates why the Secretariat had open records and allowed DJVE be placed on those same days, nothing less than 26.5 million tons?

If in April this year took over from the Secretariat DJVE control and had begun an investigation by the onca, Why the insistence on maintaining the 125 that allowed the "suspects" purchased with the sliding tax rebates?

Why the ruling bloc of Senators approved on 12 March this year, within hours of the launch of the 125, the Law 26,359, known as the "Urquía?

clear that this law authorized the creation of an office based in the city of General Deheza, Department of Celman Juarez, Cordoba, where Senator Robert Urquía has its grain export company (AGD), with its own port. From which, incidentally, could arrange the affidavits.
Why
remained in his position as secretary Javier De Urquiza? It is worth noting that the official said Echegaray's predecessor in the onca, Javier Portillo, head of irregular payments by oil company subsidies. Imagine the reader what was the most favored.

Why was rejected by the ruling party, the creation of a Commission of Inquiry in Congress as the opposition claimed it?

why it took four months to 26,351 law regulating the remedy, when he was suspected of DJVE and knew the huge increases in international prices of grains?

criteria and preferences

Also in your letter mentioned that two senators Verbitsky official "prepared a report on several of his colleagues that linked with the cultivation and industrialization of soybeans, which would affect their impartiality." Forgot

the author of "Stealing for the crown" to mention the strong preference that the president had Urquía Cristina Fernández, whom he described as "an example of the national bourgeoisie?

is worth noting that the employer was elected national deputy for Córdoba in 2007 by Fenton for Victoria. At that time the president asked him to resign his seat and stay in the Senate as head of the Strategic Budget and Finance Committee, despite being the owner of one of the most concentrated corporations in Argentina. What

allowed to hold a certain suspicion in his tone, let us say Kirchner-"independence of mind."

Milena Velba Milking Hd

WHO LOST IN THE SENATE?


By Manolo Giménez

With the rejection of Resolution 125 in the Senate were defeated democracy or institutions. Much less, the project of national and social liberation, according to his followers, would be carried out by the government of Cristina Fernández.

Nor was the failure of a redistribution plan. As this measure was not intended to tax or wealth or income, as had been the case of extractive activities (mining and oil, for example) that are essentially renters-but to production.

Conflict with rural institutions was the result of expanding beyond its material limits tax policy and fiscal conservative, which is held for decades for popular consumption and production of the provinces. Lock Out

without Goliath

The protest was fueled by the producers. Especially the smaller scale, with most them without any union affiliation. Neither

exporters oligopolies, or food processing companies or those that produce fertilizers (most of them foreign), or the broker-dealers of seed pools, participated in the protest. Precisely because that fiscal policy and the customs procedure complementarity in their favor. Especially

exporters. It never hurts to repeat it: in Argentina today are the exporters who paid the taxes or withholdings to producers on behalf of the State.

And while these same companies get a delicious difference between the actual price (FOB) and price (FAS) on which pay their own tax obligations, what constitutes a "legal" defrauding the state, there is no minimum customs controls at ports and much of private business is "black."

As expressed Jorge Rulli : "There are no agricultural policies, but there are state policies to promote export, subsidizing the production of oil and biofuels and maintain the waterway to serve the policies of corporations like Cargill" . Pinney 1



Authentic defeated in the Senate were, in fact, these corporations that dominate our foreign market, since they tried a massive fraud against the Argentine people more than U $ S 1,500,000.
timely
As made explicit in this blog, thanks to the perverse system of early declarations (DJVE) provided in the Customs Code, oligopolies tried exporting frozen at 27.5 percent (24 percent for them, by that difference FOB / FAS) the rate of withholding to be paid. That is, formalizing DJVE almost the entire 2007/2008 campaign before November 11, 2007.

international Increasing forced to roll back the price domestic price at that time. It tried to impose sliding tax system.

From this perspective one can understand why Resolution 125 did not have technical support to agricultural production, political and among the peoples of the deep interior. It was a new collaboration of the Argentine state with these companies (which are not interested in the country). Pinney 2



this item also lost state propaganda, which tried to disguise the move in Congress and the media.

Let us be clear. The project came out of Deputies was not intended to prevent soybean production, since the compensation was intended primarily soybean producers, "or balance the loads between producers large, medium and small.

Nor was intended only to afford to buy grain at prices carried back to October 2007. "This scheme applies to the sale of grain operations of the campaign 2007 / 2008" , stated in Article 13 of the rejected project.

obviously was not any strategic line or even the medium term. The

of compensation was also a bluff. As the deputy Claudio Lozano, was never given the low resolution 21/2008 of the Executive, stating that while the producer will charge retention FOB price, then to compensate they will at a lower price (FAS).

Thus, small and medium producers instead of paying withholding effective between 30 and 35 percent, as I said the text adopted, "would have paid between 38 and 41 percent.

The discursive deception

public events in the PJ came to identify with rural leaders parastatals, 1976 terrorist or civil commands 1955. There was even a senator ruling that, at the height of delirium, he compared to the leaders of the Frente para la Victoria who suffered a escrache with the Jewish victims of Nazism.

is that the propaganda strategy of the ruling sought to decorate the resolution 125, for progressive, nationalist and even revolutionary.

It's hard to accept, because there is no evidence that has attempted to implement something in this or in previous presidential administration.

contrast. With regard to agricultural production during the last two governments have strengthened the monoculture model and the resulting transgenic Argentina's international integration and forage producers. Such "expertise" to meet the needs of European Community and the big buyers such as China and India, primarily in regard to feed, oils and biofuels.

Also in the same period has continued to concentrate wealth. One could even say that the very conception and construction practice of power wielded, particularly, Nestor Kirchner, requires economic concentration: a few partners, allowing bargain directly, benefit systems as a means of political control and a small private group to share the "Argentinized."

Ghosts of

respect of the oligarchy, the so often referred from the official propaganda mills as a rhetorical device to discredit the rural protest, I must say that, historically, does not exist in traditional characterization.

Even the reactionary Rural Society has this identity. It is clear that represents producers of larger format, but these producers are quite different from the powerful landowners who, until forty or fifty years, comprised the "oligarchy vaccine."

We refer to those devoted mostly to ranchers and livestock owners of huge tracts leased in minute proportions, which were Reinsurance on food supply and price control of the British Empire.
Currently, the few heirs to remain in the area, produced directly and dependence as the rest-of purchases of oligopolies and government policies.

His lavish family holidays have become tourist enterprises and are no longer interested in promoting children illustrated, as Victoria Ocampo and Jorge Luis Borges-seeking arguments in universal values \u200b\u200bto redeem his lineage illiterate operators.


transnationalized field
is that the current agribusiness model has a very different logic agriculture and agro-industrial model that prevailed until the mid-'70s. People talk not only about traditional industry or families that have been replaced by transnational corporations, but that this change has generated, also a financial and economic matrix fully differentiated.

dismantled in 1976 INTA's seed bank and transferred that knowledge to corporations that began to land in Argentina. It opened on biodiversity gene bank and began to share with the multinationals. Standard

Giarraca , coordinator of the Rural Studies Group Gino Germani Institute (UBA) noted that "foreign input suppliers, then began to bring the hybrid seed that the farmer can not play and at the same time is higher yields. Agriculturación began a process with five grains using hybrid seed and chemicals, which rose much production: sunflower, sorghum, wheat, corn and soybeans. These cultures were expanded gradually inland. There was an increase in productivity with the opening of the exchange rate and began the transnationalization of agriculture. " This transnationalization

was consolidated when, in the late '80s, food companies began to pass into foreign hands and in 1991 orchestrated the deregulation of grain, meat and sugar.

Later came the foreign hypermarkets (true empires as Carrefour or Wal Mart), which were established for control of prices in the domestic market in the core areas of power in the agricultural industrial chain. That is, get to decide what to produce, how to produce, when to produce and what price to the "table of the Argentine people."

Sociology of tin and Teflon pans

In other words, qualifying farmers and landholders as the "principal enemy" is to understand very little about the ties of dependency today supporting Argentina. Arturo

Jauretche , Infogrames victim of so many power points in recent days, once said: "It is easy to see that the problem prior to the distribution of wealth is that we own them, so that the first does not have to fight among ourselves but with whom they are taken ... "

By the way: not the jumbo elegant cities, which demonized the jinglero Ignacio Copani and sociologists firing banal make any form of oligarchy. Even the most reactionary and tiling.

So we can say that none of them reaches add half of the estate or some "comrades of national and popular field" as Hugo Moyano, Miguel Angel Pichetto or own Nestor Kirchner.

Anyway, it was foreseeable the futility of such manicheisms between "poor and the rich" to address issues of this kind, verbal trifles, more typical of the medieval monastic orders or the rhetoric of punk vernacular to D'Elia a proper conceptual framework for the elucidation of Argentina's problems.

Who voted against the project officer?

With only vote the opposite of political opposition (including the dissident Peronist Duhalde, Menem and Rodriguez Saa), the project had been approved, like almost everything, until then, had sent the Executive.

But to the surprise of professional political porteños appeared provinces. Since the resolution 125 does not affect only one sector, but the entire interior. As the increase in export tax rate to a decline in income of producers and, consequently, a decrease in revenue for the Profit Tax.

Many leaders, governors, mayors, legislators and even the vice president Nation, who came to accompany the National Government were forced to confront. They were not slow to qualify as "traitors."

The Homeland is mine, mine, mine happens that

Nestor Kirchner is convinced that it was solely the work of his administration that Argentina's economy recover from the 2001 crisis. Consequently, nothing is forbidden and may have when you want and how you want the profits of an "economic miracle" that belongs only to him. A kind of revitalized syndrome "Testa Rossa".

This emotional trap and Kirchner their sycophants is imperative to rescue the government headed by Cristina Fernández .

This will be essential, among other things, designing a true nationalist agrarian policy and modernization, which contains the provincial economies as well as producers and landholders, while formalizing the reinvestment of income for productive purposes and industrialists and respecting the preservation of natural resources. With public agencies to guide the production and support prices, to formulate a new concept of leases and land ownership, to put limits on transnational oligopoly nationalizing foreign trade. There

an excellent opportunity. Would not waste it.

What Kind Of Diet Is Kathi Lee

The way of General Mosconi


By Raul Quiroga

Especially these days, when the confrontation between the government and rural organizations seem to monopolize information, any discussion on oil and energy resources seems to be alien to the public interest. Something like a matter of very technical, concerns only to specialists.

However, both the oil and gas, electricity, uranium, or the so-called "alternative energy", are an urgent agenda of politics. And not just talking about projects, but policies that have an active participation. Because

power generation should be directed to the use and enjoyment of the society as a whole. Is that all the activities carried out daily by our people is related to energy production. Since the plastic or synthetic material to medicine communications: a multiplicity countless everyday items depend on power generation.

A national compass

In most advanced countries of the world's energy matrix supported on the gas and oil is 70 percent. In contrast, in Argentina is 90 percent, which suggests that those who manage energy in the coming years not only have their hands on a good business but also the keys to economic strategy and political power.

In our country, from 1907 to 1993, this vital resource was controlled by the federal government. Thus, thanks to the income earned by the central administration, could create the energy structure we enjoy today. That is, by controlling the national state could build in that period, almost all of the levees and dams to which the country as well as the vast majority of its pipelines.

also with energy income schools were built new towns and even in places where it seemed impossible.

In other words: oil horizon adopted a self-centered character and with an eye always on a reserve capacity of no less than 20 years. Even during the governments outside the popular will and dictatorships, this horizon remained unchanged.

present the reserves of our country only if they reach the 7.4 years since the sector transnational corporations operating in our fields, while refined and streamlined the extraction of oil-not invested in exploration and drilling.

This irrational mining is beginning to be revealed in service stations, while speaking in official circles, with ever greater insistence on the possibility of importing gas oil. Lost

rudder

We are at a breaking point. It is necessary to recover the management of our resources. Especially in this time of uncertainty in international securities, as the trend indicates that beyond the end of this year a barrel of oil will exceed U $ S 200.

General Enrique Mosconi argued that the defense of Argentine deposits of foreign companies was necessary "A great insensitivity to all solicitations of private interests-consistent or not with the collective interests," but, above all, we need a political power capable of containing all the opposing forces. "

"It is inexplicable," he said the existence of citizens who want to dispose of our oil deposits agreeing exploration and mining concessions to foreign capital, to favor flood it with profits from such activity is obtained, instead to book all these benefits to enhance the moral and material welfare of the Argentine people. Because our oil is delivered and give our flag. "

It's time to get back on track.

Blurred Vision And Chest Pain

In a wake there are dozens of people
that dead do not know,


But all night crying in the cold

splendidly as mourners paid.

By
desire to drink a cup of hot coffee.

SANTOAMOR

V. Bernardelli Model 60

Epigram Epigram

Voice
your body is not forever,
still not knowing
goldfinch sing in his life.

SANTOAMOR

Los Hombres De Paco Episodes Free Watch

A river steals a bit of sun
to stop being sad and slow life
.

SANTOAMOR